Nevyn
2011-11-01 09:47:43 UTC
Is anyone else confused about moonlight?
Under http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight#Licensing:
Moonlight 1.0 is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, it is a pure C++
engine.
Moonlight 2.0 contains code that is licensed under the terms of the GNU
LGPL and the MIT X11 licenses, it includes the graphical C++ engine, the Mono
Runtime <http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:Runtime> and the Mono class
libraries.
But they offer up "Moonlight 4 Preview". I'm wondering.... just how
concerned I should be?
Regards,
Nevyn
http://nevsramblings.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
NZLUG mailing list ***@linux.net.nz
http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nzlug
Under http://www.mono-project.com/Moonlight#Licensing:
Moonlight 1.0 is licensed under the terms of the GNU LGPL, it is a pure C++
engine.
Moonlight 2.0 contains code that is licensed under the terms of the GNU
LGPL and the MIT X11 licenses, it includes the graphical C++ engine, the Mono
Runtime <http://www.mono-project.com/Mono:Runtime> and the Mono class
libraries.
But they offer up "Moonlight 4 Preview". I'm wondering.... just how
concerned I should be?
Regards,
Nevyn
http://nevsramblings.blogspot.com/
_______________________________________________
NZLUG mailing list ***@linux.net.nz
http://www.linux.net.nz/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nzlug